According to Bitzer's definition of rhetoric having 3 parts; exigence, audience, and constraints, I believe that President Obama's speech is an example of rhetoric. The speech was the traditional speech given to kick off Ramadan and while he did so he used that time to address the controversial issue of the mosque being built near Ground Zero.
I came to the conclusion that exigence meant an outstanding issue that needs to be addressed. In the speech it was the controversy over the mosque and the kicking off of Ramadan. If you ask me it was a fitting time to get a response or to combine them. A lot of people have voiced their opinions of the topic of the mosque. One day while watching CNN I heard someone say that it was a deliberate plot to mock what took place on September 11th. I know my opinion on it but I am curious to find out what other people think about the mosque being built.
Anyways back to rhetoric. The second part of Bitzer's definition was the audience. Not necessarily the mass it was being targeted too but someone in class mentioned the audience also being someone who has the power to change or fix the exigence. In the case of the mosque it could be many people. Americans, government officials, anyone who can help ease the minds of those uneasy of the matter.
The third part of rhetoric was the constraints. In the speech, technically the law allows the mosque to be built but changing the attitudes is another thing.
One thing that really stood out to me within the speech was Obama's way of pointing out who the enemy actually was. How it was Al Qaeda instead of the entire Muslim culture.
I really enjoyed looking at this speech and interpreting it as rhetoric. Makes you think how often you see rhetoric in your daily lives...